It is my well-meaning intention to develop this blog to facilitate communication within a network of friends and other netizens, and discuss almost any subject, topical or otherwise, away from the rants and sarcastic remarks seen on many media Websites. Please feel free to either comment or suggest subject matter.
Wednesday, 12 March 2014
Thursday, 13 February 2014
Travel 9 - International Retirement
Recently, a close friend told me of her wish to retire to a country other than her own, with only one requirement; the English language. Now, that requirement needs a definition which, from my understanding, means any country where knowledge of the English language by the local population would be sufficient to permit reasonable communication.
A source of information ① provided one list of more than 90 countries using the language formally. Of course, many of these countries use a form of English greatly modified by localization (other languages, dialect, and accent) that affect one’s ability to communicate. In fact, there are only eight countries where English is the majority language, as a proportion of the native English population; U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, Nigeria, Ireland, South Africa, and New Zealand.
Of those countries, the Canadian government ② cautions against any non-essential travel to Nigeria. Thus, from the few remaining countries, a Chinese citizen faces a difficult immigration hurdle to jump over.
Therefore, I looked elsewhere, and discovered 'International Living' ③, that appears to offer a treasure trove of information. Unfortunately, some of the information appears to be out of date or in conflict with other destination information found elsewhere. Nevertheless, it is a useful initial source. For example, they provided me with a list of “Top Ten Retirement Havens” comprising the following; Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil, France, Panama, Nicaragua, Italy, Costa Rica, Uruguay, and Belize. Unfortunately, only three of these countries (France, Italy, and Uruguay) avoid the Canadian caution advisory against all forms of travel. Therefore, to avoid strict European immigration rules, I concluded that Uruguay should be investigated.
Montevideo, Uruguay, has been named as the "second least expensive city in the world" ④ and, certainly, seems to show good value against the dollar. It has a low poverty level, the second lowest level of corruption, and is the most developed and prosperous country in Latin America. Between the years 2007 and 2009, Uruguay was the only country in the Americas that did not technically experience a recession. Aesthetically, it is a very old-world European city, mainly as a result of the Spanish history, with minor British and Italian influences, and 85% of the population are of European origin.
Located within a temperate zone, Uruguay has a climate that is relatively mild and fairly constant nationwide. Seasonal variations are pronounced, but extremes in temperature are rare. Therefore, one may assume a closer investigation into our search for a haven is required.
To be continued, perhaps.
① wikipedia.com
② voyage.gc.ca
③ internationalliving.com
④ mercer.com
① wikipedia.com
② voyage.gc.ca
③ internationalliving.com
④ mercer.com
Labels:
Australia,
Canada,
communication,
English,
haven,
immigration,
international,
Ireland,
language,
Latin America,
New Zealand,
Nigeria,
retirement,
South Africa,
U.K.,
U.S.,
Uruguay
Wednesday, 15 January 2014
Environment 2 - Waste Management
Initially, I had titled this post, ‘Garbage’, but then I decided that the word meant worthless. The question must be, ‘Is the material that we discard really worthless or, just, waste that we seem unable to convert into something useful?’
I doubt if there is anyone who does not believe that we must manage our waste more diligently, but are we?
Recently, a local NGO distributed blue, intelligently illustrated, collection bags to every household to encourage people to set aside recyclable items, i.e., paper, plastic, glass, and metal. This was a good idea, but I do not belief that it is sufficient to change bad habits. Perhaps, people creep stealthily to the communal garbage containers in the middle of the night ... I don’t know, because I never see them (Then, I guess that they never see me, either). I did notice one person at the local supermarket the other day who considered it a useful shopping bag.
What else can we do? A recent TV programme about poorly packaged goods, discussed waste disposal, and mentioned something that I must convey to you (The idea for this post). An interview with the supervisor of a waste-sorting facility stated, with examples, that although they are quite capable of sorting glass from metal, etc., if any of these individual materials are stuck together, e.g., paper to glass, or plastic to metal, they can not separate and, therefore (and here’s the revelation), all these items are sent to the main waste-disposal dump. During the TV interview, cameras showed that the majority of the items appeared not to be destined for recycling.
Good intentions, badly managed ... at what cost?
Friday, 3 January 2014
Politics 10 - Thin Edge of the Wedge
The U.K., the place of my birth but, now, a place that is almost unrecognizable in certain areas. The County of Kent, where I grew up, known as The Garden of England, feels different, as if there is a pulsing undercurrent of unrest. My loved Thomas Hardy County of Dorset, pictured on Christmas cards (Remember those?), breathes the fresh air with innocence of an uncertain future. London, of course, has always been a multicultural city, since being established by the Romans, and where it was usually difficult to distinguish one culture from another but, now, there is an obvious ‘frontal attack’ by an increasingly dominant, and vociferous, Islamic community ... and the government appears to lack any authority for which to display the necessary control.
Most English villages developed around small farming groups. Produce marketing established the eventual village shop; A religious need built a church; eventually, a sense of community introduced the Public House (Pub). Over the years, there were more shops, churches and, certainly, more pubs, as towns and cities were born (Please excuse the simplification).
Today, Christian churches are closing, and Islamic domes are constructed above their roofs. Many shops are boarded up because of changing customer needs and, in their place, some are reopening with signs written solely in Islamic script (The Quebec language police would have a heyday with that). The need for social community takes place in the mosque (although the ‘need’ for some Muslims is doubtful), and, thus, the once-popular pub has closed, and dereliction has taken over ... a probable breeding ground for extremists.
A good friend of mine who made a more extensive tour of the U.K. recently, wrote to say that he was forced to double-check his air tickets because he felt sure that he had landed in Pakistan by mistake. He wasn’t exaggerating.
One is bound to ask, why do Muslims emigrate to a country that sells world-famous pork sausages, tasteful ale, and listens to glorious choirs singing in cathedrals every Sunday.? If I had wished to become an Australian, I would have gone to Australia, but I admired the Canadian way of life and came to Canada. Is this new wave of immigration the result of Muslims wishing to become British because they admire the British way of life? It seems such an alarmingly sad question when they carry banners saying, “Kill the Queen” and “Sharia law for everyone”.
I think this to be a very important question for a country like Canada which believes, wrongly, in a policy of multiculturalism. In 2012, 257,515 immigrants and 23,056 refugees came to Canada, and the Minister for Immigration states that these numbers are planned to continue in the future. It may be too late for the U.K. (and France), but it could be a warning for us.
The U.K. and Canada (and other similar countries) occasionally make changes to their respective list of “safe” countries, (Countries from which refugees are no longer accepted). It occurs to me that refugees from these countries who have enjoyed the safety, and benefits from our welfare systems, could be deported back ... certainly, if they have not proven to be productive members of our society (I have written elsewhere about the huge number of criminal immigrants in our over-crowded goals).
I see it as the thin edge of the wedge, that requires a sensible strengthening of immigration and deportation laws.
As a Postscript, my attention is focussed on our indigenous communities. They are Canadians too, yet we segregate them to wilderness reserves. I am tempted to suggest that we set up reserves for refugees too, after all, Australia does it. Remember, qualified immigrants come here after a long intensive scrutiny to integrate and become tax-paying, employed Canadians, whilst refugees come to simply escape politically and culturally unsafe countries. I imagine that when the word travels globally that refugees in Canada no longer live in highly subsidized, high-rise apartments, etc. (usually, better than low-income Canadians) there would be an remarkable reduction in refugee numbers ... simply because some of them are not refugees, but ‘queue-jumpers’.
Now, we shall discover if controversy creates discussion, anonymously or otherwise.
Your comment is welcome by clicking below
Wednesday, 1 January 2014
Light Bulbs
Whoah! Throw away those warm incandescent light bulbs? Could this be the first conspiracy theory for 2014? After all, only 10% of our electrical energy supplies is used for domestic lighting, which makes the energy saving claim a little exaggerated, don’t you think?
But they say that 90% of the warm incandescent energy is give up as heat. Well, where does all that heat go, other than warming up your accommodation ... unless you open the windows, of course. Oh, I know, I must have flunked neuroscience PhD.
No longer sold at a store near you? Probably because I bought the last wholesale box of 500 bulbs. Just kidding ... someone else did.
Will the cold mercury-filled fluorescent lights be replaced later by LEDs? People will realize soon enough that paying 500% more for a 10% saving could border on the brown envelopes theory. So, throw away those fluorescent lights. Wait a moment, didn’t we just do that?
Anyway, how many MPs does it take to change a light bulb.
Have you ever tried to read the newspaper by those twinkling LED lights. I know, I know, what’s a newspaper? I’ll get to that later.
Happy New Year
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

