Sunday 22 November 2015

9,000 Views


It’s always exciting when the Pageviews Total has three zeros at the end of it, especially, I should point out, that my own page views are not computed.

This time, reflects a busy month.

Browsers:  Chrome 23%.  Firefox 18%.  Safari 7%.

Operating Systems:  Mac 53%.  Windows 22%.  Linux 16%.

Viewers:  1st Canada.  2nd U.S.  3rd Russia.  With interestingly lone viewers in Poland and China.

Titles:  Religion 8 - Religion or Cult.
         Immigration 4 - Assimilation.
         Aerospace 11 - Great News.

Of Note;  Percentage Formula has, finally, lost its popularity.




Saturday 21 November 2015

Religion 9 - Religion or Cult?


Like, so many people, I have been involved in private conversations regarding the question of fundamental Islam.  While conversation can be interesting, it is limiting in individual scope, such that I felt the need to expand the specific subject of cultism to an Internet discussion amongst my circle of friends, et al.

Thus, this Blog discussion desires your participation.

Obviously, there was, initially, a conversation regarding the development of ‘Daesh’ (A derogative term for the illegitimate organization called ISIL), that changed its focus into the question defining a cult.

One friend introduced a suggestion that the numbers of asylum seekers from the Middle East into Canada should be reduced to 10,000 per year and, then, balanced by increasing the numbers of Asians (Specifically from India and China) on the basis that Asian people had a historic antipathy towards Muslims.  India’s democratic government allows Islam to flourish ... for the moment.  China’s Marxist (Communist) government, otherwise described as “democratic with Chinese characteristics”, seems able ... at the moment, to avoid fundamental Islamic problems.  In fact, in my opinion, there is no fundamental Islamic problem in China.  The whole Muslim culture is a problem according to the government.  It seems that many countries believe that China is correct on this question.

The subject became one of cultism by suggesting that China itself was a cult society.  I had to disagree with this misrepresentation.  China, as a Communist country, bans all forms of religion (Other than that mismanaged by the CCP) and this creates a belief, to the outsider, that religion thrives underground in small groups resembling cults.  In my experience, most Chinese people are very spiritual, almost naive (As may be observed at any Buddhist temple) but not religious in a Christian sense.

Thus, there was a statement that Islam is a cult, to which I disagree.  ‘Daesh’ on the other hand, could be described as a cult, because of its religious veneration, sinister practices, misplaced admiration for a particular person, and being fashionable among a particular section of society.

Now, therefore, the question extends to Christianity, is it also a cult?  I believe that, even though there are small cults within Christianity, it is a religion ... Islam too.  On the other hand, Buddhism would, more accurately, be defined a cult (It does not believe in superhuman controlling powers).

Should cults be banned?  Are we all religious in one way or another, or simply spiritual?  Is it a matter of defining terms?



Please join the conversation.


Friday 20 November 2015

Aerospace 12 - Great News


Bombardier Celebrates the Completion of its CS100 Aircraft’s Certification Flight Test Program

Behind schedule (The pundits keep telling us) but two years ahead of the competition.


Thursday 19 November 2015

Immigration 4 - Assimilation



I’ve wanted to write this for some time.  Ever since I realized that my posts were becoming rants.

I’m a nice guy.  Really.  And I feel that I know something about fundamental Islam (I’ve lived and worked in Islamic countries).

Fortunately, I am an immigrant who became a citizen ... and I use the word ‘fortunately’, wisely.

It was easier for me to assimilate into Canadian culture, although I don’t usually like to get up on a Sunday morning and drive, half asleep, to a restaurant for ‘brunch’, eh.

But, now, I find myself frustrated by misunderstood Muslims who exacerbate the Islamic Problem.

This isn’t about hate.  Buddhism taught me that ... Christianity too.  It is about assimilation.

Let me conjure up a common scene for you:
A city center on a sunny weekend.  Any large city in Canada (This could also apply, for example, in the U.K. or the U.S.).
Imagine being able to stand in a prominent position overlooking the scene.
Now, scan the crowd and identify a French Canadian.  Possible?  No.
Ok, try to identify an Italian Canadian, a Korean Canadian, or a Mexican Canadian.  Impossible.  Right?

Now, try to identify a Muslim Canadian.  Oh, wow!  That’s easier than eating strawberry ice cream.

But it’s not about numbers.  It doesn’t matter if there are 25 or 25,000, they are identifiable, and it’s got nothing to do with religion.  The Qu’ran demands only that they should dress “modestly”.  Just like my mother, I suppose.
In my opinion, it’s about the Muslims misinterpreted belief that they are different.  That a world defined by Sharia law would be perfection.  Quiet, moderate, Muslims do not loudly decry the Islamic inspired atrocities because they are patiently ... waiting.

Actually, back in the city center, there are a few young Muslims who look like other Canadians but, unfortunately, they are too afraid to be identified by demanding that their imams teach assimilation and not contradistinction ... hopefully, in one of the two official languages.

Is it enough to just simply "hope"?


Sunday 1 November 2015

Education 11 - Qualifications


I have been commenting on Google+ with someone who was advised that using the title Photojournalist was illegal because she did not have any academic qualifications related to such occupation (Even though she was, obviously, highly skilled).  I wrote that this was only a term and, therefore, the question was simply grammatical.  Only by registering a business name, e.g., Photojournalist Limited could it attain any form of legality.

Others joined the conversation to point out that the use of the term doctor was also illegal.  I replied that the word doctor was also just a term unless used in conjunction with an academically related descriptor such as Doctor of Medicine ... naturally from a recognized university.  Otherwise, the term doctor could be used if there is no academic representation, e.g., PfD. (Doctor of Feng Shui) or PcD. (Doctor of Chocolate) and such use would suffer a certain, deserved, humour.  This applies, equally, when using the term accountant or engineer without a degree.  Graduate accountants should become members of professional institutes and, thus, become accredited Chartered Accountants (CA), and engineers would become Chartered Engineers, etc., and the list goes on.

Therefore, if ever someone shouts, “Is there a doctor in the house?”  Please be aware of the real need.

At one time, I was employed privately in a contract position in Bangladesh as a teacher of EFL at a corrupt private teaching hospital that should remain nameless (International Medical College).  An American university also had a contract to, among other things, provide academic faculty.  Thus, they hired an itinerate American individual who was idling in Asia as a teacher without any formal EFL qualification (Undisclosed B.A.) and permitted him to use the title, Professor (Not even Associate Professor) for influence purposes, while I was addressed as Mister, even though I had worthier experience and skills but, unfortunately, without any association with the said university.  Incidentally, the other teacher had never even stepped within the walls the university.  When last heard of, he was studying by Internet with an Indian university, while resident in the Philippines, for a combined, one-year, MA/PhD. degree, that simply required the review of a number of obscure novels ... you may try to figure that out on your own.

In contrast, I know of great numbers of university teachers with credible PhD. degrees who are only Assistant or Associate Professors.  This is solely the prerogative of the university ... and acceptable to most of us.

Now, I must conclude this, perhaps, nugatory post to concentrate on my overdue Culture of Chocolate thesis.

By the way, if there seems to be a sense of victimization within this post, it is intentional ... and would deserve comment.