Today, a copy of the CBC “Morning Brief” appeared in my eMail describing a new woke survey published by Reuters (Dan Kitwood). This did not surprise me because, if one searches well enough, a poll may be discovered somewhere indicating a “truth” fitting any narrative — but I was somewhat annoyed that Reuters did not choose to value my, or any of my associates, opinion on the matter (“Opinion” only).
After all, the King of England is, firstly, the choice of English people (More later) and other countries of the Commonwealth however, choose to accept his position as they wish (Technically, not accurate, but you know what I mean). My point here is that Canadians are, or should be, not part of the decision-making process.
The title of this article states that 60% of Canadians do not recognize the King while, a few paragraphs later, they become simply respondents.
I have written before on the controversial question actually defining a Canadian, and the simple answer is someone qualified to carry a Canadian passport, i.e., not random respondents (Contrary to the whim of our current P.M.).
Therefore, unlike countries of Communist dictators, and the probability that the banana-republic Canada will become controlled by the CCP … we still have a King, thus immigrants, both legal and illegal, and refugees, real or not, should sit quietly in their government-subsidized apartments … until, if necessary, deported.
Past readers of Bernie's Blazar will be aware of my deliberately controversial tone, in order to cause discussion … I look forward to the spore.
It is extremely important that Temporary and Permanent Residents not be permitted to vote for anything that constitutes constitutional change. Such a rule will greatly reduce the 60% number indicated above.
ReplyDelete